Brian Eno: Illustrated Talk – 10/29/11 MoogFest

All photos © 2011 Charles Martin

We arrived at the Thomas Wolfe Auditorium to begin the queue around noon. Eno’s talk was at 2 p.m. and was scheduled until 4:30. Only a handful of people were there at first, but by the time two o’clock was nearing, the line stretched from the front of the Thomas Wolfe down to the Asheville Library. Seating was general admission and we made a bee line for the seats; ending up about 5-7 rows back from the front. This was something of a watershed moment for me; I’d previously seen Robert Fripp play soundscapes and give a Q+A afterward, and now I’d be getting the Eno side of the equation. Fripp, it must be said, had the demeanor of a stern headmaster. This would be a shock to no one. Personally, I couldn’t think of a question vital enough to ask and not be on the receiving end of Fripp’s disappointment. How would Eno take to the podium?

We didn’t have to wait long. After 20-30 minutes of people arriving and seating themselves, the lights dimmed and Brian Eno was introduced to the 70% capacity hall. Like a flashback to vintage lecture hall classes in college, Eno was equipped with four different colored Sharpies®, a few prepared transparencies, a bottle of water, and some blank transparency material to create some freestyled slides for the overhead projector driving the whole shebang.

click to enlarge

Eno began his talk by citing his forebears who provided him with artistic inspiration. John Cage, Steve Reich, and Terry Riley, who would next occupy the hall for a MoogFest Concert, were all cited for their influence into systems [or generative] music that had a large impact on Eno’s artistic development. He then began speaking from a loose outline, which he projected behind him on the screen. He used overlays to indicate that there were several possible flows to the path he could take, and in and of itself, that doevtailed with one of his main themes he would explore on this talk of why we are drawn to art. More on that later.

click to enlarge

First he established that we are all cosmically insignificant with a basis in Copernicus’ heliocentric theory of the universe [since proven]. Mankind then had an inkling that the universe did not, in fact, revolve around him and his glory. He then projected a graph of the variety of life on earth, of which mankind is but a sliver, statistically speaking. Extrapolating further on this theory, Eno then projected a helpful image of the universe with the tiny legend of “you are here” hidden somewhere in its fullness. Not entirely unlike the Infinite Perspective Vortex as it appeared in “Hitch Hiker’s Guide To The Galaxy!’

"How did I get here?"

At one point after chasing a loose thread of his talk, Eno returned to his overheads confised, murmuring “how did I get here?” And following that the man did exactly what I would have done in his shoes. He began singing beneath his breath the chorus to “Once In A Lifetime” as he had just given himself a perfect song cue! This, undoubtedly, was the coolest thing I have ever seen a “pop musician” do in public. As a song cue whore of the strongest stripe, I fully understand the sick compulsion to answer verbal cues with the appropriate bit of song, even if I loathe the song in question. I just have to do it. I’m compelled. And apparently, so is Eno. That he would do it with a song he wrote is irredeemably cool beyond any reproach!

click to enlarge

Having given his memory a jog via “Once In A Lifetime,” he then went on to his main theme in his talk illuminating this discussion of why we are drawn to art. He postulated a continuum of control versus surrender, whereby the act of surrender is to willingly cede one’s control in a liberating fashion to any number of things. Art amongst them, but also noting religion, sex, and, drugs as some other valid stimuli. He further extrapolated on the interrelationships between many of these disciplines, at one point quipping “If anyone knows ways in which all four of these stimuli are interrelated simultaneously, please let me know.”

click to enlarge

Control hierarchies, consequently, are places where art does not thrive because it undermines authority necessary for control. He placed a transparency showing the Church of England as an example of a control oriented hierarchy. He also offered military and orchestral organization as other examples of a pyramidic hierarchy where information flows in one direction only, and thus leaves the organization stumbling blindly through the universe under the control of a small faction dominating the many.

Surrender as a virtue

Alternatively, redundant, multi-directional hierarchies, such as a sewerage system in Denmark he cited, have a flow of information throughout its structure whereby change can quickly be undertaken in response to crises. This was offered as a model of how and why creativity and art breed within systems that are designed to better support them. He proffered the nomenclature of “scenius” to refer to group intelligences of a high degree of creativity where individuals form communities that are hotbeds of art and creativity.

Can one resist a bald genius steepling his fingers?

One aspect of this was that human brains are getting smaller than generations ago because when human communities formed, less of our brains had to be preoccupied with the business of survival, leaving us time and wherewithal to begin specializing in areas that were not related to simply living. Furthermore, computers and technology allow us to offload dependence on our own memory onto a technological artifact. In theory freeing us up to move elsewhere with our brains.

"You have very good taste."

At a certain point he became aware that time was getting away from him and he was most concerned that Terry Riley should be able to soundcheck properly before his concert, so Eno then took questions from the audience for about ten minutes before wrapping up what was precisely like a particularly great college lecture from a lively and witty speaker. My friend got in the question queue without thinking and managed to fire off the question “how is it that you are part and parcel of so many artistic endeavors that I value?”

“You have very good taste,” quoth the Eno to my friend’s unceasing pleasure. As if he needed to hear that from an expert. On an Eno high, we left the auditorium and made our way back home where we planned to view his photos and share them with my wife, who was at an alternative seminar on Jung’s Death Mother Complex that day. When we saw her she stopped us short and asked us to sit down. She was the one with a story to tell first. She had gotten breakfast on her way to the seminar and was sitting in her car with the engine running [her heater was on that morning], eating her food. When what to her wand’ring eyes did appear but a bald head weaving its way past her on the sidewalk, moving in the direction of the trendy Indigo Hotel complex. In a town full of bald guys, she knew she’d just had an Eno sighting!

Click to enlarge

Reacting without thinking, she immediately left her car [engine still running] and followed Eno to his hotel and after determining that it was, in fact, Brian Eno at the hotel desk in front of her. She quickly welcomed Eno to Asheville and asked for an autograph while simultaneously apologizing for the intrusion. To which he replied positively and having received his John Hancock, she thanked him and beat a hasty retreat back to her car, which was thankfully still there. She then produced the Holy Writ of Eno for her awestruck audience of two to see. She couldn’t believe that she had done something so impulsive and fannish, but she was still grinning like the Cheshire Cat!

At this point I’ll wrap this Eno report up with an anecdote from very early in my relationship with my wife. It was a Sunday morning and I was slicing potatoes to make hash browns. I suddenly had the urge to hear “Taking Tiger Mountain [By Strategy]” and when “The True Wheel” came on, the woman who would become my wife began singing along! When I related this revelation of intense coolness to my friend Charles, he simply replied “marry that woman!” Thus endeth the tale!

-30-

Unknown's avatar

About postpunkmonk

graphic design | software UI design | remastering vinyl • record collector • satire • non-fiction
This entry was posted in Core Collection, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Brian Eno: Illustrated Talk – 10/29/11 MoogFest

  1. Echorich's avatar Echorich says:

    Quite a wonderful tale…although I had a bit of a college lecture shiver at one point. I enjoyed my college experience, but need not relive it ever. For me the best part of daily University life was finding myself in Downtown Manhattan every afternoon. NYC was my campus and my main buildings were right around the corner from the Gramercy Hotel and the Iroquois Hotel where almost every band I cared about stayed…This is when I gained my lifelong appreciation of hotel bars.
    I appreciate the fact that Eno has an understanding of the science of man which informs his music. While I may not be a fan of all of the collaborations he has been involved in as producer or musical partner, there are a few which I deem very important. Firstly, Fripp/Eno. Their work is on a plane of its own. The second is his work with Talking Head and David Byrne – Fear of Music and Remain In Light being the zenith of that collaboration.

    Like

    • postpunkmonk's avatar postpunkmonk says:

      Echorich – I echo your appreciation of his Talking Heads work. It just got better and better with each album! I would call “My Life In The Bush Of Ghosts” insanely influential. Yes. However, we all know Eno’s far from infallible. U2 just make my bile rise and only two weeks ago did I ever hear Coldplay for the first time. Charles brought along a DVD of the Eno episode of Arena called “Another Green World,” after the title track that is used as the series theme song. In it they showed some clips of Coldplay and I finally heard those guys. Oh dear. Oh dire, is more like it! Absolutely pathetic U2 wannabees, who make U2 sound like genii! There are many benefits to being a premature curmudgeon who has largely disengaged from our culture. Not hearing the likes of Britney Spears, Coldplay, or Lady Ga Ga are among the manifold delights of avoiding television and radio. Sadly, I can no longer say that about Coldplay or even Lady Ga Ga as Heaven 17 played one of her Madonna clone songs on their podcast as an example of “without X you wouldn’t have Y.” No surprise at all there with Ga Ga. Exactly what I would have expected from her.

      Like

      • Echorich's avatar Echorich says:

        Certainly, Eno has not been infallible and the U2 work kinda tops that. The Coldplay albums are a close second.
        I gave Coldplay a try when they first appeared. At that time the band seemed much more influenced by the Bunnymen than U2 – Chris Martin was even on the second Bunnymen reunion album in 99. Trouble and Yellow were interesting and a nice break from the very boring world of Britpop bands like Oasis and Blur. But quickly, and in mean QUICKLY they fell into the “to be as big as U2 you need to sound like U2” hole and lost me completely.
        As for Talking Heads, they could do no wrong….until Speaking in Tongues. Now I know they could not make another Remain In Light, nor would I have wanted them to and thank god they never attempted to replicate the nihilistic broken beauty of Fear of Music, but Speaking In Tongues and Burning Down The House let me down. Of course the rest of the US lapped it up! There music lost it urgency and immediacy for me. There were memorable tunes after 1980, but I had built up such an high level of expectation from the debut album and by 1983 it was over for me.

        Like

        • postpunkmonk's avatar postpunkmonk says:

          Echorich – Yeah. Talking Heads post 1980 are a sliver of the band they once were. I guess it was The Eno after all! I can maybe squeeze a single best of from the other four albums, but the returns diminish on a geometric curve as you progress forward. I really liked the side careers of Jerry Harrison and Tom Tom Club though! Harrison’s “The Red + The Black” functions as the logical progression from “Remain In Light” for me. Tracks like “Worlds In Collision” manage to be so heavy they suck up light itself, like a sonic black hole!

          U2 is like religion to me. I was not exposed to it at an early age and I just don’t see the allure or point. To this day I still haven’t heard the first note from “Boy” – I’ve only seen the live clip of “I Will Follow” on MTV. In fact, MTV clips from ’83-’92 constitute all of the U2 I’ve ever heard. Yawn. And isn’t Bono such a smug little creep? If he looked any more self-satisfied he’d have to be licking his own genitals, I suppose! At least R.E.M. had the class to retire first!

          Oh – another example of Eno’s fallibility: “Outside” by David Bowie! Egads, but that’s a tough listen! For every good idea that manages to manifest itself, there’s two bad ones snapping at your heels. Still, that’s a better ratio than on “Never Let Me Down” which has more of a 1:7 ratio of good:bad ideas. About 4-5 songs from it are quite good, but the bulk of groaners and gaffes surrounding them make it completely unlistenable in a linear fashion. It’s the album most appropriate for iTunes purchase/shuffle play that I own. I’ve read articles about the making of that album that are far more interesting and rewarding than the album itself. Eno’s creative games in making it were way better than the turgid, date-stamped, end product.

          Like

  2. ronkanefiles's avatar ronkanefiles says:

    Nice autograph! Never seen one so concise before…

    Like

  3. Echorich's avatar Echorich says:

    Hooray for Jerry Harrison and Tina Weymouth!! The two that gave David Byrne the most “agita” I agree that The Red And The Black is a logical extention of Remain In Light. Harrison is obviously much more important to the sound and direction of Talking Heads than their written legend ever allows – after all he was a Modern Lover and has proved himself as a creator and producer over the past 25 years or more. As for Tina, every time Byrne attempted to get “the girl” out of the group she pushed back and proved herself. Even in the expanded melange of the 1980/81 Talking Heads, she shines! Tom Tom Club certainly had a sound that was a few steps ahead of the curve. Genius of Love was special song.
    As for Bowie/Eno’s Outside… cut up concept album, flash cards and improvisation added up to too much yeilding too little. The Pet Shop Boys remix of Hallo Spaceboy is the most memorable product of this endevour. I will give that it had some retro feel to it and I still give it a chance every once and a while, but I just don’t get the purpose of Outside.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.