OMD’s “Architecture + Morality: The Singles” Casts A Fresh Eye On An Old Standard

OMD monktone 1981
1981’s Peak OMD gets the love on this release

I had posted on this disc in it’s pre-release/announcement phase. But that didn’t mean that I heard it until almost three years later! Sure, sure. I’m usually all over OMD material like white on rice, but in 2021 I was trying to cut back on spending on music. And I succeeded. Then came 2022: the year of transformative home improvement upgrades. And 2023 was all about family issues and saving for the big Eurotrip in 2024. Well, all of that’s behind me now. And I still have been fretting over nabbing a copy of this in recent months, but thanks to a generous commenter’s care package from Scotland, it [and a few other other delightful releases] are now in my Record Cell. So of course I must wrote about this!

OMD architecture + Morality the singles cover art
EMI | EURO | CD | 2021 | 3583902

OMD: Architectire + Morality The Singles – UK – CD [2021]

  1. Souvenir
  2. Motion & Heart (Amazon Version)
  3. Sacred Heart
  4. Souvenir (Demo)
  5. Choir Song (Rough Mix)
  6. Motion & Heart (Live at Drury Lane, 1981)
  7. Joan Of Arc
  8. The Romance Of The Telescope (Unfinished)
  9. Joan Of Arc (Live at Drury Lane, 1981)
  10. Joan Of Arc (Rough Mix)
  11. New Song (Georgia Demo)
  12. She’s Leaving (Demo)
  13. Maid of Orleans (The Waltz Joan of Arc)
  14. Navigation
  15. Sealand (Demo)
  16. Submarines
  17. Maid of Orleans (Demo)
  18. Joan Of Arc (Maid of Orleans) (Live at Drury Lane, 1981)

For today’s review, we’ll stick to the material in bold that represents the tracks not previously released. The demo of “Souvenir” is much the same, wistful delight, but the production is less layered and more crisp and direct. The delay on the melody almost has a slapback effect to the sound/ The drum track is less thunderous on the godlike percussion break where only the choral tapes and the drums reign for a few bars. And Paul Humphreys’ vocal is less layered with overdubs and effects to stand out more from the mix.

It takes guts to put two versions of the same song on a row on a compilation, but in this case, the “Choir Song [rough mix]” revealed a form of the track before the name had been applied to it. The famous choral tapes that were the song’s genesis were still there, of course, but the production of the synths was more prominent and synthpoppy in attack. Sporting expressive countermelodies new to my ears. In fact, if you’ve ever heard Greek synth duo Marsheaux’s cover version of “She’s Leaving” the vibe here was much the same! The drum track here was crisper in attack, as was Paul’s vocal.

The rough mix of “Joan Of Arc” was not dramatically different from the final version, save for the more prominent and different, glockenspiel. The biggest change was the somewhat dissolute vocal from Andy McCluskey. Here he was not yet putting the passion of his final performance into the song. Well, that’s what rough mixes are for.

We got another peek beneath the cowling of the “A+M” album with a deep cut. “New Song [Georgia Demo].” They had not yet titled the tune at this point, but the music bed was not dissimilar to the final version. Again, the difference in Andy’s vocal performance was the big takeaway here. He sang the song in a lower register in the first few bars of each verse, but the last few bars still rose to the same pitch as the final mix; giving the song a wider dynamic range. And the soviet choral tapes and sound effects were of course, missing from this mix. And the tempo may have been ever so slightly slower.

The demo of “She’s Leaving” had a long, buildup of random synth waves before the doubled delay synth rhythm finally manifested and brought the song into sharper focus. Then the delay on the lead synth riff have the song an almost pizzicato effect that was delightfully crystalline. The lack here of rhythmic discipline gave the song some very scruffy edges that were very different. As was the character of McCluskey’s more insouciant vocal.

“Sealand” demo was a brief snippit at 3:04 of the Prog-length opus on the album. The rhythm track was the most basic snare loop imaginable. The lead synth almost sounded like an accordion duetting with a car horn. It was all very skeletal, but it sure nailed the melancholy vibe that they would eventually coax out of the song magnificently. Any fan would recognize it as “Sealand,” though it was but a précis at the time captured here.

The jittery new instrumental “Submarines” was touched by Moroderesque doubled leads and throbbing bass synth. It was a delight to hear this though I can see why it was put aside as the vibe was var more technopoppy than what the A+M album would eventually stand to represent. The wailing lead recalled the watery sound of a bosun’s whistle, so I really get the “Submarines” title. This might have had a more apt home of the “Dazzle Ships” album that followed, but it never came to that, surprisingly.

All of this material was a delight and of interest to this rabid OMD fan, but even I have my limits. And they were crossed by the “Maid Of Orleans [Demo.]” it staggered my mind to consider how the most thrilling of OMD’s performances [that can still make me weep with emotion after 43 years] could have initially been rendered as a tinpot Irish sea shanty with thin, cheesy synths that brought to mind MIDI karakoke files. I get on my knees and thank the OMD gods that they were able to transform this slightest of tracks into the magnificence that eventually was “Maid Of Orleans [The Waltz Joan Of Arc].” If I had heard this back then I would have said to dump it and move on!

Rating: 5 out of 5.

Of course, that took care of the “new” material. The singles and B-sides, and live tracks fleshed this out into a delight auxiliary volume that allowed us to re-experience what was OMD’s most celebrated hour. The differences between the early versions and mixes illustrated how OMD were transitioning from the technopop and modernism of their first album to something in 1981 that used a perverse mix of new and old technology [like Mellotrons] to arrive at a unique sound that was paradoxical in that it utilized modern technology to sound centuries old.

I think it would be very possible to re-arrange A+M for completely acoustic instruments far predating the 20th century and have it still hit the listener’s ear with all of the impact of the 1981 album. The material here shows the development of the songs before they eventually wrapped their heads around the unique vibe that the “Architecture + Morality” album would eventually have. It’s also very common for significant albums like that one to get a huge boxed set reissue on their nth anniversary. How unlike the pack of OMD to instead curate a companion volume as delightful as this was.

-30-

Unknown's avatar

About postpunkmonk

graphic design | software UI design | remastering vinyl • record collector • satire • non-fiction
This entry was posted in Core Collection, Designed By Peter Saville, Record Review and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to OMD’s “Architecture + Morality: The Singles” Casts A Fresh Eye On An Old Standard

  1. As the years march on I gain more and more appreciation and affection for OMD. I listened to this on *gasp* streaming (my own collection of OMD is paltry and embarrassing) and found it MOST insightful. I agree, I would be very interested to hear most of this album, heck a lot of the catalog, acoustically. That would just help to underscore what great songs they create.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Gavin's avatar Gavin says:

    This is one of my favourite and most listened to albums by OMD.
    I love hearing early incarnations/demos of songs I have spent decades adoring-I have never been a fan of remixes,especially “dance” oriented ones but truly alternative versions are right up my strasse.
    The artwork for this was also handled well and it is a great companion to the parent album.

    Liked by 1 person

    • postpunkmonk's avatar postpunkmonk says:

      Gavin – I didn’t get to this but I was crestfallen to hear the amazing coda in “Navigation,” possibly my favorite OMD B-side, almost completely snipped off in the mastering on this CD! Does anyone have any clues as to why the heavy hand?

      Like

      • markgcjack33's avatar markgcjack33 says:

        You think that’s bad. Least ‘Navigation’ is a barely there song (as in about 10% words/oh-oh-ing and 90% music, which was their bewildering 1981 way. When their 1984 album got remastered, they took the usual recording of ‘Tesla Girls’ and substituted the unasked for single edit, and actually shortened album track ‘Love And Violence’! At least with ‘Navigation’ you have it complete on the 2004 B-sides compilation of the same name!

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Roy Solomon's avatar Roy Solomon says:

    Not directly related to the post, but we caught OMD on their UK tour earlier this year and they were excellent – well worth seeing if you get the chance.

    Like

    • postpunkmonk's avatar postpunkmonk says:

      Roy Solomon – I have to ask… did they play any material off of “English Electric?” I actually saw them, in America, ON the EE tour, technically – playing a hits set opening for Barenaked Ladies (brr) and though the T-shirt (and sweatshirt) had “English Electric” artwork nary a song was played. Then in 2018 (2 years later) we saw the wonderful “Punishment Of Luxury” tour and [once more] not a note from EE! Is there a conspiracy going on that I don’t know about?

      Like

      • markgcjack33's avatar markgcjack33 says:

        Yes it’s aggravating I know, but most quality acts that have been around ages do this. There’s only so much room in the setlist and they always feel they have to put in the big obvious 80s singles, plus big ones from certain other albums. Naturally some albums get left out, hell Kim Wilde doesn’t even feature ANYTHING from her 1983 album and it’s one of her career-best but she bewilderingly cold-shoulders it still and forever. With her, even Duran Duran and all the other best 80s people, once an album from the last few decades has done the rounds, anything from it is unlikely to be performed again, especially when the same old stuff is done. I get how you feel, I feel it too, but I’ve just been more used to it for longer. Don’t expect any “EE” at their next concert either, or if there is, another album or so will de dropped. It’s how it is for all but the most arrogant ones at love everything they do (Dep Mode, Pet Shop Boys, Simple Minds and certain unmentionables).

        Liked by 1 person

  4. AndyB's avatar AndyB says:

    I bought this on release and really enjoyed it. It’s interesting to hear how different some of the early versions are. I wonder if there are many other unreleased tracks in the vaults from this period.

    I’m surprised that the temptation to release a box set for this classic album was resisted. I for one would have snapped it up. Although with all the material released from this period we could create our own.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I’m with AndyB — there’s probably enough material related to this album to stretch to a box set, maybe throwing in some Stephen “5.1 Surround” Wilson remixes of the singles to flesh it out to three CDs.

    Again, looking forward to hearing this!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. markgcjack33's avatar markgcjack33 says:

    I get why this album (seen as their most classic masterpiece) is again revisited, but for me, as lovely as it is, it’s lack of songs for a full album still harms it, well at any event prevents it from being the top-drawer perfect duo that “Crush” and “Junk Culture” are, but even with the latter I had to add the previously unreleased ’10 To 1′ to take it to just 10 tracks. They were so aggravating back then, wouldn’t push any album to 10 tracks, bar “Crush”. Instrumentals are not songs, and while listenable, I don’t usually play them when I do the album. Was chuffed to hear ‘Brand New Science’ from the extra disc of wholly unreleased demos from their 2019 box set and see it was the only song dated for mid-81, exactly the time this album was being recorded; they were utter fools not putting it on there, nor the even less-song themed “Dazzleships” follow-up, and I make sure I always play this song when “A&M” is on. Again, they dump ‘Gravity Never Failed’ from the album sessions too-probably cos it sounds like a normal song, with verse and chorus sections, and it’s even worse to do so when Paul sings the chorus. Clearly the rule seems to be for this album-cool as it is-if more than half the songs are over 30% vocals and not long instrumental passages and choral effect, the duo don’t want them. And the fact that all of those demos on that unreleased box set CD are as vocally committed as they are musically, I’d say that confirms the suspicion. Still a lovely album though, of course, and trust ‘Submarines’ to be another instrumental. I sometimes think they prefer making those to songs with words.

    Like

Leave a reply to markgcjack33 Cancel reply