Book Week – The Clash: The Clash

I was not the biggest Clash fan around. I still have never heard their first or second albums [ducks] though I was aware of the first one from at least the point where it was released in the US. I was such a non-fan, that I never saw copies of “Give ‘Em Enough Rope” in stores until way after “London Calling” was out! So to my teenaged ayes, I thought “The Clash” was their first album, with “London Calling,” their second. The second album was a double album, and when “Sandinista!” dropped with three discs in its sleeve, I was incredulous. Would their fourth album be a quadruple vinyl set? At that rate, yes. So obviously, I was a good target for the 2008 coffee table book “The Clash” by The Clash.

Grand Central Publishing | 2008 | 384 pp.

I did always like the punk embrace of bright neon pink; perhaps an ironic appropriation of color via the seedy origins of the word. I’m sure it was calculated to cause maximum Dad Outrage®, yet was not as problematic and wrong as the similar use of the swastika. I saw this hard to miss book in a record store visit last year, Since it was selling for just $5 [a price sticker inside from its original sale put it at $45 – a bargain for a book produced to this standard] I bought it without a second’s delay. This was one of my favorite things; a fat, hardcover coffee table book produced in a visually appealing way about a band that I liked. The conceit of it was that it was by the band. Technically, yes, but really, it was a book that had an editor more than a writer. All of the text was quoted from the band members, so this also got around the sticky problem of Joe Strummer being dead for six years by the tim that this was published. With the band members quotes being the enormity of the text, it really points to the editor of this book as defining its flow and arc in ways that probably count as more writer than editor.

The balance between text and graphics was near equal, with the large format, full pages often being given to the reproduction of single photos taken from the band’s history. Black and white photos were the order of the day, but even the color ones here, looked B+W! There was just not very much hue information in late 70s England, I guess. Other prominent visuals were given to the band’s posters and flyers; sprinkled throughout the book with full tour date information for every tour they ever undertook duly listed in full. All of this followed the band’s timeline, so this was very traditional compared to the Grace Jones book we discussed yesterday, which follows a very crooked path.

Since I was practically a Clash newbie [in spite of having previously read a Strummer bio “Redemption Song: The Ballad Of Joe Strummer” by Chris Salewicz – which also was published in 2008] I learned quite a lot about the band which was marginalized or even not included in the Strummer book. I can’t believe that I was not aware that Machiavellian manager Bernie Rhodes was out of the picture for almost two years when the band were beginning to make inroads in America in ’79-’81. Of course, once Rhodes was back on board, they reached critical mass with the “Combat Rock” album. A record I never much cared for as an album but it certainly moved units in Reagan’s America.

Some pages were collages of a place ant time

The dismissal of the Strummer/Simenon “Cut The Crap” album within a scant half page as if in passing spoke loud volumes here. Similarly, even though Terry Chimes was the original drummer for the band, who later rejoined when Topper Headon’s drug habit got him sacked in 1982, the thrust of the book cites Headon as the primary drummer for the group. It’s his name on the front cover with Simenon, Strummer, and Jones.

In a way, this book is something of an ironic construct. The Clash were very political punk ideologues. Seeing them as the focus of such a fine consumer product as this hefty tome sends me mixed signals, even as I appreciate the effort carried out [and willingly bought it. I can perhaps take solace in the fact that this book initially sold for a modest $45 when I could have seen an asking price easily twice that. But then, that would have hardly been in the spirit of the band, which saw them selling a triple album for $9.99 in America by reducing their royalty rate by 50%. Who else would have taken such a financial hit for their principles? Taking that into consideration, anyone who appreciates The Clash will have much to admire here. Better still, the book is available as an e-Pub DL book for a scant $3.30 at Rocket88 Books right now, if you’ve got an interest.

– 30 –

About postpunkmonk

graphic design | software UI design | remastering vinyl • record collector • satire • non-fiction
This entry was posted in Book Review and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Book Week – The Clash: The Clash

  1. The first two albums — and the first one in particular — paint a portrait of late 70s Britain like no other save possibly the Sex Pistols’ one actual album. As brilliant as London Calling was, it was a sellout record by comparison to the first two. I’d strongly encourage at least a sample tour through the records via iTunes or Amazon or some such: many punk classics are contained therein. For my money, those first two albums between them make both the most coherent statement on punk in England, and the case for punk rock as the new folk music (by which I mean the political/protest side thereof).

    If nothing else, Terry Chimes renaming himself Tory Crimes both kicked off a trend of politicised names, and proved the band (or at least Chimes) were way ahead of their time. We could certainly use another band with the power and fury of The Clash today …


    • postpunkmonk says:

      chasinvictoria – But, but… Which version of the first album do I get? The fact that the US and UK versions are out there did the last 20 years immobilizes me.


      • Taffy says:

        I prefer the US version, but that’s mostly cause it’s the track-list I knew from when I first bought it on vinyl, and it has a bunch of wonderful UK singles appended to it. It was years later before I even heard the songs dropped from the original UK album to make room for those singles.


        • postpunkmonk says:

          Taffy – I probably heard various tunes from the US edition when it came out. I know chasinvictoria had a copy and I think it was the US version. I did not know about the differences until 1998 or so when I saw that Epic/Legacy had reissued both of them on US CD. My preference is to always buy the “real” UK version, sometimes waiting many years to track it down, but I can vouch that occasionally, the meddling US label sometimes results in a more enjoyable compilation as compared to the actual album released elsewhere [ssssssh!]


  2. The Swede says:

    I’m still reeling from the news that you haven’t heard the first two albums!


    • postpunkmonk says:

      The Swede – Never got around to it and it wasn’t a priority. The first Clash album I bought was “Sandinista!” when it came out. I only bought “London Calling” in 1998-ish. I bought “Combat Rock” when it came out. Sold it off in the Great Vinyl Purge.


  3. Speaking of “Cut the Crap,” for the past two Record Store Days, Crooked Beat Records in DC has released “Recutting the Crap”–two compilations of DC-area bands doing versions of tracks from The Clash Mark II’s “Cut the Crap” or the (much better) “Out of Control” demo (that showed how much better of an album that could have been if Bernie Rhodes hadn’t been at the controls). I’ve reviewed them here:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.